Imagine a platform for compliance is $12,000 a year. Does that sound expensive?
The replacement it makes will determine the answer.
If $12,000 is spent to reduce the time spent in the repetitive gathering of evidence across the complex technological world that could be well invested. The calculations would be different in the event that a small group of individuals could gather the same amount of evidence in just a few minutes each month.
That’s a useful way to approach the search for a Vanta alternative. The question of which platform offers the most features isn’t the only thing to consider. Consider what these features can help your business save time and money.
The Break-Even Point of Automation
Automating compliance isn’t necessarily good or bad. The benefit of compliance automation will change as the company expands. Imagine a technology firm which is growing, several cloud environments, a variety of applications, and constant changes to access. The task of collecting evidence constantly could be extremely high. Integrations that automatically monitor systems and take evidence are able to justify the cost.
Imagine a company of 10 people getting ready for its first SOC 2. It may have a relatively small infrastructure, and the evidence collection could be managed with no significant automation.
Vanta pricing is based on this variation. Although an advanced platform might provide a variety of capabilities However, they’re only beneficial for organizations that are in need of them.
Compare Architecture Not Just Brands
Searching for Vanta or Drata quickly turns into a feature by -feature task. The two platforms are built on automation and integration and therefore, companies seeking this type of approach will benefit from comparison of the frameworks that are supported with their integrations, service, as well as individual quotations and contracts.
However, there’s another choice you’ll need to take. Do you want to use an integration-driven compliance platform or not? Some companies want constant monitoring as well as automated collection of evidence. Some businesses prefer to collect evidence on their own.
Vanta Competitors don’t all follow the same pattern.
A lot of Vanta competitors are also in the same class that concentrates on automation. There are lighter platforms focused on organization with extensive system connectivity.
CertAssist is part of the latter group. CertAssist was created by internal auditors, compliance consultants as well as other experts, is a system for organizing controls frameworks into a single workspace. It lets you edit policies and guidance for evidence, and allows auditors to view evidence through read-only access.
It does not connect to operational systems nor install infrastructure agents. Customers upload their own proof.
The System Access consideration in the Making
The removal of integrations comes with a clear disadvantage: one must collect evidence manually.
This also means that integration setup is eliminated and this means that the compliance application doesn’t require standing connections to the operational environment.
Both of these architectures are equally great. The key question is what best choice is appropriate to your business.
CertAssist is aimed at teams that comprise between five and 200 persons. The company publishes its prices, rather than requiring the salesperson to discuss the starting figure. The launch price is $225 a month, that’s a difference from the normal price of $375 a month.
Let Complexity Take Its Place
What a startup with 10 employees requires today might not be the same for 500 or 100 employees.
While compliance is simple an easy platform can be a good idea. As the amount of employees, systems, frameworks and evidence demands increase, the economics could ultimately favor more automation. Let complexity be the primary factor when buying compliance technologies.
Spending money on fifty integrations just because they look great in a comparison table is not worth it. Spend money on them if manually performing the task they replace is the more costly option.